Examining the Application of Ig in Multiple Disease States

by | Jul 17, 2019 | Latest News

LinkedIn0

Examining the Application of Immunoglobulin in Multiple Disease States: A Review of Evidence

Activity Overview: The administration of immunoglobulin (Ig) has become common practice in the treatment of patients with immunodeficiencies, and, more recently, in other disorders, including inflammatory diseases and autoimmune neuropathies. Patients with these disorders experience significant morbidity and mortality, and the often life-altering consequences of these diseases can also have substantial direct and indirect costs accounting for billions of dollars impacting the US economy. With the continual research into the genetic basis of disease, more data will be forthcoming on the evolving use of Ig in patients with genetic abnormalities. Healthcare professionals require proper training and foundational knowledge on best practices for the use of Ig agents to provide patients with clinically appropriate and cost-effective individualized options for therapy that will improve treatment outcomes and overall quality of life.

Elena E. Perez, MD, PhD

Immunoglobulin Use in Immune Deficiency and Autoimmune Disease States

Abstract: Although immunoglobulin (Ig) has been available since the 1950s for replacement therapy in primary immune deficiency, many other effective uses of this class of biologics have been investigated and evolved over recent decades. Ig administration has become common practice in the treatment of the immunocompromised patient and has recently expanded into the treatment of those patients with an inflammatory disease and autoimmune neuropathies per established clinical guidelines. As research into the genetic basis of disease advances, clinicians should better assess complex data surrounding safe and effective uses of Ig to treat patients who present with B-cell and T-cell deficiencies, along with those harboring gene deletions or genetic anomalies who may potentially benefit from Ig therapy. Evidence-based clinical indications for the use of Ig include idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia, Kawasaki disease, chronic idiopathic demyelinating polyneuropathy, multifocal motor neuropathy, bone marrow transplantation, and pediatric HIV infection, among others, and have evolved over time. Ig is also often tried in refractory cases that might benefit from its anti-inflammatory effects or empirically in off-label situations. Due to its anti-inflammatory effects, high-dose Ig has been used for numerous off-label indications with varying levels of effectiveness and evidence to support its use. A review of all autoimmune conditions for which Ig has been used is beyond the scope of this article and newer treatments are available for many of these disorders. Here the focus will be on selected conditions in which Ig has clear benefit. Because there is a limited supply of Ig and a need for further research into optimal use, it is important for healthcare professionals to better understand current and developing indications and data/levels of evidence to support Ig therapy as its role continues to evolve.

Differentiating Characteristics and Evaluating Intravenous and Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin

Abstract:  Clinicians have a range of options for treating patients with disease states that require the use of immunoglobulin (Ig). Traditionally, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) administration has provided effective therapy for a variety of disease states. More recently, subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) administration has become available for patients with primary immunodeficiencies and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). Ig is used as replacement therapy in patients with primary or secondary immunodeficiencies and has been shown to reduce morbidity due to bacterial infections associated with antibody deficiency. The mechanism of action for use of Ig in the treatment of autoimmune disorders is complex and partially understood, but immunomodulatory effects have been suggested in CIDP and multifocal motor neuropathy. The available IVIG and SCIG products differ in their pharmaceutical properties (eg, pH, osmolality, IgA content, sodium content, and stabilizer), which can affect safety and tolerability in some patients. The pharmacokinetics of Ig also differ based on the route of administration. With IVIG administration every 3 or 4 weeks, peak concentrations are greater and trough concentrations are lower, which can increase the propensity of systemic adverse effects (AEs) and impact tolerability of therapy. SCIG infusions are typically administered more frequently (ie, biweekly, weekly, and even daily based on patient need), resulting in steady state concentrations with fewer fluctuations in Ig plasma levels. The route of administration plays a major role in the types of AEs seen in patients receiving Ig therapy, with systemic AEs associated with IV administration and local reactions more commonly seen with SC administration. By understanding the differences in IVIG and SCIG products, which are not interchangeable, and the patient characteristics that guide product selection, clinicians and managed care providers can better serve patients with immunodeficiency disorders and other disease states.

Stacey Ness, PharmD, RPh, CSP, MSCS, AAHIVP

Leslie J. Vaughan, BS, RPh

Managing Cost of Care and Healthcare Utilization in Patients Using Immunoglobulin Agents

Abstract: Although immunoglobulin (Ig) has been available since the 1950s for replacement therapy in primary immune deficiency, many other effective uses of this class of biologics have been investigated and evolved over recent decades. Ig administration has become common practice in the treatment of the immunocompromised patient and has recently expanded into the treatment of those patients with an inflammatory disease and autoimmune neuropathies per established clinical guidelines. As research into the genetic basis of disease advances, clinicians should better assess complex data surrounding safe and effective uses of Ig to treat patients who present with B-cell and T-cell deficiencies, along with those harboring gene deletions or genetic anomalies who may potentially benefit from Ig therapy. Evidence-based clinical indications for the use of Ig include idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia, Kawasaki disease, chronic idiopathic demyelinating polyneuropathy, multifocal motor neuropathy, bone marrow transplantation, and pediatric HIV infection, among others, and have evolved over time. Ig is also often tried in refractory cases that might benefit from its anti-inflammatory effects or empirically in off-label situations. Due to its anti-inflammatory effects, high-dose Ig has been used for numerous off-label indications with varying levels of effectiveness and evidence to support its use. A review of all autoimmune conditions for which Ig has been used is beyond the scope of this article and newer treatments are available for many of these disorders. Here the focus will be on selected conditions in which Ig has clear benefit. Because there is a limited supply of Ig and a need for further research into optimal use, it is important for healthcare professionals to better understand current and developing indications and data/levels of evidence to support Ig therapy as its role continues to evolve.

Obtaining Credit: Participants must read the article, complete the online posttest, and an online evaluation and request for credit. Please click on the link to be directed to the activity in its entirety, including the online pretest and posttest, activity evaluation, and request for credit.

CE Program